We see a lot of websites selling giclee art, offering printing services or
simply criticizing the technology. One particular site states that a giclee is
not art that will have any value for collectors. The site proceeds to state that
there is nothing wrong with the technique but no one should buy a giclee for
investment. The logic behind this way of thinking is that a giclee is after all
produced by a machine; then, how dare an artist sell a limited edition created by a machine? How does a buyer expect to receive anything that will
possibly appreciate?
Let's examine this flawed logic: a giclee is created by a
machine: so was the Gutenberg Bible, which was produced with moveable type and
oil based inks. Different machines, different times, same possible result. If
you buy something that is rare, sought by collectors, it will fetch a pretty
penny. Let' s go to an extreme. If Leonardo or Picasso had made a signed limited
edition of 100 giclees of their artwork, do you think collectors would not value
them because they were reproduced by a machine? Nonsense.
If art marketing has taught us anything, it is that it is not the medium that
matters, it is the rarity and desirability of a piece that will command value.
This same website also talks about longevity. The well intentioned writer
mentions that any statement made about giclee and archival properties is
worthless. Saying that a giclee will last 75 years is impossible to verify
because all tests pointing to this amount of time are accelerated. Well, what
are we supposed to do: wait for almost a century to verify it is true?
Accelerated tests have been conducted in many fields, including the
pharmaceutical industry. In the case of giclee, extremely high amounts of UV
light, humidity etc are applied to simulate what will happen in a long period of
time. One more note about archivability: over the centuries artists have produced
paintings that would crack because of faulty paint density layering, acidic
substrates, unfit raw materials. This has never stopped a good work of art not
to be appreciated and valued.
To be fair, the other side (printers and dealers) is contributing to the
misconceptions: I receive calls from artists who order canvas giclees of their
art and receive delicate, flat reproductions. What they were promised was
instead a fine reproduction of their work. It does not have to be this way. Ask
many questions before you embark into a giclee print project.
Do not expect to follow the hype of many sites who promise that once you made
your giclees with them the world will magically buy all of them. Again, it is not the medium that counts; you still have
to have shows, market your work and constantly beat the road.
Conclusion
The reason why the giclee technique is becoming so popular lies in the fact
that an artist can actually make a decent income in addition to selling the
original art. If he or she wishes, the original does not even have to be sold.
Digital artists create giclees as their original medium. Photographers can
offer their work on fine art papers and canvas. In addition, some artists use
painting techniques that are very time consuming. If they were to depend on just
the originals, they could not make it. Giclee offers another outlet.
Am I saying giclees are right for everybody? Absolutely not. On the other
hand they can be a tremendous asset in the hands of a business inclined agent,
artist or photographer.
|